Photo editing programs have long been a part of our lives, so you can rarely see a photo that hasn’t been retouched. However, it’s wrong to think that Photoshop belongs only to the modern world. People have been improving the looks of their portraits for centuries. That means there were specialists in photo retouching that date all the way back to the nineteenth century. Even painters have worked hard to make models look more beautiful than they really were.
At Bright Side, we searched the archives and found photos of royalty from the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, and we compared them to their portrait paintings. At the end of the article, we’ll show you what Vincent van Gogh really looked like.
Isabella II of Spain (1830 — 1904)

Mary of Teck, the spouse of George V (1867 — 1953)

Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the mother of Queen Elizabeth II (1900 — 2002)

Princess Helena of the United Kingdom (1846 — 1923)

Victoria, Princess Royal, German Empress (1840 — 1901)

Charlotte of Belgium (1840 — 1927)

Sophie of Württemberg, Queen of the Netherlands (1818 — 1877)

Queen Victoria (1819 — 1901)

Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain (1858 — 1929)

Maria Luisa of Bourbon-Parma, Princess-consort of Bulgaria (1870 — 1899)

Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia (1882 — 1957)

Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom, Queen Victoria’s fifth daughter (1857 — 1944)

Alexandra Feodorovna, the spouse of Nicholas II of Russia (1872 — 1918)

Princess Alice of Battenberg, the mother-in-law of Queen Elizabeth II (1885 — 1969)

Alexandra of Denmark, the spouse of Edward VII (1844 — 1925)

onus: Vincent van Gogh (1853 — 1890)

What do you think about Photoshop? Do you use it often? Tell us in the comments below.
Major Retailer To Slash 3.5% Of Jobs And Close 5 Mall Anchor Locations

A Major Retailer Will Close Five Mall Anchor Stores And Cut 3.5% Of Jobs
Macy’s unveiled a strategic restructuring strategy as a major step in reviving its image and adjusting to the constantly shifting retail scene. The venerable department store chain plans to close five of its full-line locations and reduce staff by 3.5%. This occurs as incoming CEO Jeff Gennette’s successor, Tony Spring, a new leader with new ideas, gets ready to assume over.

A corporate spokeswoman acknowledged the employment reduction, citing the necessity to become a more nimble and efficient organization in order to meet changing market and customer needs. This action is in line with Macy’s resolve to maintain its leadership in the cutthroat retail sector.

It is noteworthy that activist investors hoping to profit from Macy’s real estate holdings had made a bid that the retailer had been considering. Tony Spring will soon take over as CEO, thus this reorganization may indicate that Macy’s will once again prioritize its core competencies and long-term growth plans.
The outgoing CEO, Jeff Gennette, had earlier stated that the major shop reductions that had been going on since 2016—which included the closure of over 170 locations—had come to a stop with the announcement of the closures a year ago. Analysts for the sector have speculated that there may be more closures to come.
Increased presence in smaller, off-mall sites is one of Macy’s proactive efforts. In order to accommodate changing consumer tastes, executives have stressed the significance of striking the correct balance between in-store and off-mall establishments. Five full-line stores will be closed in the upcoming year as part of a broader initiative to maximize Macy’s shop portfolio.
The first publication to report on these changes was The Wall Street Journal, which referenced an internal memo to staff members that disclosed intentions to remove some 2,350 corporate roles in the upcoming month. Initiatives like supply chain automation, outsourcing, and quicker decision-making procedures targeted at boosting competitiveness and efficiency are predicted to be the main drivers of these reductions.
Apart from shutting down its locations, Macy’s is also planning to sell and move two of its furniture stores. This calculated move demonstrates Macy’s dedication to maximizing its asset base and reallocating funds where they will have the biggest impact.
The Macy’s anchor stores in the impacted malls—which are situated in Virginia, Florida, Hawaii, and California—will close. Although there may be some short-term interruptions, this is in keeping with Macy’s goal of building a network of stores that is more dynamic and effective.
Macy’s is setting out on this revolutionary journey with a conservative mindset, intent on upholding its heritage while adjusting to the reality of the new retail environment. Tony Spring’s new team is well-positioned to lead the business into a more promising future and maintain Macy’s position as a mainstay of American retail.
It will be interesting to watch how these developments pan out and how Macy’s redefines its position in the cutthroat retail market as this retail behemoth keeps changing. Watch this space for further information about Macy’s makeover and its attempts to remain competitive in the retail industry.
Leave a Reply