Rose McGowan, an actress, recently sparked a contentious discussion on Twitter over media mogul Oprah Winfrey. Her tweet revealed a different side of Oprah, casting doubt on the public’s view of the powerful person and bringing up issues with the way she has used her influence over time. Numerous Americans were drawn to this information, which resulted in a post going viral.
McGowan accused Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein of sexually abusing her, and in a tweet, McGowan blasted Oprah for her alleged ties to Weinstein. Using the hashtag #lizard, she criticized Oprah for allegedly backing a “sick power structure for personal gain” and even branded her out as “fake”. There wasn’t much opportunity for interpretation with this clear-cut and unambiguous remark.
It’s important to remember, though, that McGowan’s post was made nearly a year after Oprah resigned from her role as executive producer of the Russell Simmons documentary for #MeToo. Oprah clarified that she didn’t think she and the filmmakers were still on the same creative page and that more work needed to be done to fully depict the stories of the victims. Oprah stressed her steadfast conviction in and support for the women who came forward as victims in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter.
Oprah did star in a film that was distributed by Weinstein’s media business, so it is true that she had prior relationships with him. Oprah admitted her previous friendship with Weinstein when the charges against him surfaced, but she insisted she was unaware of his predatory behavior toward women. If she had known, she claimed, she would have spoken out against his reprehensible actions.
Oprah’s relationship with Weinstein serves as a reminder of the difficulties in keeping personal and professional interactions separate, as well as the complexity of the entertainment industry. It’s critical to understand that people can be victims themselves as well as supporters of victims.
Rose McGowan has attacked Oprah outspokenly, but she has also become entangled in the controversy surrounding the California Gavin Newsom election recall. Notwithstanding these events, McGowan’s tweet is significant because it emphasizes how critical it is to report abuse and hold people accountable, regardless of their standing in society or level of influence. It serves as a reminder of the strength that comes from speaking one’s truth and advancing the social justice dialogue.
Тhеsе Vintаgе Glаss Соuld Wоrth Mоrе Тhаn Yоu Тhink!
Many of us grew up seeing these charming dishes in the homes of our relatives, perhaps sitting on a mantel or a kitchen shelf, adding a touch of vintage elegance to our daily lives and sparking curiosity and admiration. These vintage Hen on Nest dishes, with their intricate designs and vibrant colors, evoke a simpler time when such treasures were both practical and decorative.
Dating back to the 18th century, Hen on Nest dishes were initially imported to the U.S. from England at significant expense, making them luxury items that only the wealthy could afford. In 19th century, these dishes were produced by renowned glass companies likе Westmoreland, Indiana Glass, and Fenton. They were often used as candy dishes or trinket holders, their charming hen figurines meticulously crafted to capture the essence of a country farm. The detailed feathers and expressive faces of the hens add a touch of pastoral beauty, making each piece a miniature work of art.
These dishes can vary significantly in price, with some of the most vibrant or authentic-looking pieces originating from the ’70s to ’90s. By examining the details carefully, you can often determine their age, though many lack a maker’s mark. Most pieces typically sell for $5 to $30, but particularly rare or older items can fetch $100 or more. For those looking to start a collection, there are plenty of affordable and colorful options available.
Leave a Reply