According to the documents, Webb was the “head of Jolie’s security detail for two decades, and he remained in that role for approximately four years after the couple divorced.”
Webb stated that Jolie “required him and his contractors to sign NDAs relating to various personal and professional details of her, and her family’s, life.”
After the couple filed for divorce, they had a major custody battle over their six children. According to the documents, Webb claimed he “received multiple calls from Jolie’s representative, who told Mr. Webb to remind his staff that they had entered into NDAs with Jolie and that if they testified in a custody proceeding, Jolie would sue them.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06836/068363eaf01bcbdcc043416936876c309186652d" alt=""
Webb said that he had conveyed the message to his contractors, and both of them confirmed that they would testify if they were to be subpoenaed.
The documents further claimed that “one of them told Webb that ‘he would testify about statements he overheard that Ms. Jolie made to the children, encouraging them to avoid spending time with Mr. Pitt during custody visits.’”
The documents also stated that the “the two security contractors both testified” despite being threated with being sued and shortly after, Mr. Webb’s company was fired by Jolie.
Webb himself does not claim to have heard Jolie’s directive instructing the children not to interact with Pitt during custody visits. He now also works for Pitt.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f37a/0f37a6a58c6faff5f3c874aa2254886d9e062dfa" alt=""
Jolie’s attorney, Paul Murphy has since then addressed the media over this matter. He said in a statement, “Mr. Pitt’s continued attempt to equate common NDAs for security personnel and housekeepers covering confidential information employees learn at work, with him demanding an expanded NDA to ensure the continued coverup of his deplorable actions remains shameful.” “This case is not about NDAs in general, but about power and control. All Angelina has ever wanted was separation and health, with positive relationships between all members of their family, including Mr. Pitt. She looks forward to the day when he is finally able to let her go,” the statement further read.
The latest filing comes after over a month after Jolie’s lawyer filed documents claiming that Pitt had been physically abusive toward her even before the alleged infamous plane incident of 2016. That incident, according to documents, was the final straw in asking for a divorce.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14364/14364d0399e5f02344d35c3b30672ba80bc949ee" alt=""
The motion that Jolie’s legal team filed in early April, most revolved around the dispute over their shares of ownership in their French winery estate, Château Miraval.
Her legal team filed a motion asking the court to compel Pitt and his legal team to provide “responses” and “documents” that explained why the actor “suddenly conditioned his purchase of Jolie’s share of Miraval on her agreeing to a greatly expanded NDA now covering Pitt’s personal misconduct, whether related to Miraval or not.”
Jolie firmly claims that this move to demand NDAs was Pitt’s attempt to “cover up” the alleged abuse against Jolie and their children.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3b70/b3b70088d77dc984e7cb4533474c2ee81ee0e232" alt=""
Pitt was never charged with a crime after authorities investigated the 2016 plane incident.
In contrast to what Jolie’s legal team is saying, Pitt’s lawyers allege that it was Jolie and her team who requested a “broader” NDA.
She was considered to be the most beautiful actress in the 80th. But time takes its toll – the star looks so different now. You won’t recognize the movie star when you see this wrinkled old lady.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af24/7af247cb9e3b2682b981edcc34add01f4beca027" alt=""
Rachel Ward, known for her iconic role as Maggie in “Singing in the Blackthorns,” was once celebrated as the most stunning actress in cinema. Forty years ago, she captivated audiences with her striking beauty and talent. However, as time has passed, the effects of aging have become evident.
Now 66 years old, Rachel looks quite different from her 80s persona, especially without makeup and styling. Recent photos of her have sparked mixed reactions. Many express surprise and nostalgia, reminiscing about her past allure. Comments often reflect this duality, with some admiring her natural aging process and others lamenting the changes brought by time.
Despite the physical changes, Rachel Ward’s talent and the impact of her performances remain unchanged. Her portrayal of Maggie in “Singing in the Blackthorns” continues to resonate with audiences, eliciting fond memories and appreciation for her skill. This beloved film has cemented her place in cinematic history, and her work is still celebrated by fans old and new.
Rachel’s decision to age gracefully, without resorting to cosmetic enhancements, has garnered admiration from many who see her as a symbol of dignified aging. They appreciate her for embracing her natural self and staying true to who she is.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7371d/7371da717861058e6da14b7218b314a685822e1b" alt="She was considered to be the most beautiful actress in the 80th. But time takes its toll – the star looks so different now. You won’t recognize the movie star when you see this wrinkled old lady. She was considered to be the most beautiful actress in the 80th. But time takes its toll – the star looks so different now. You won’t recognize the movie star when you see this wrinkled old lady."
Regardless of differing opinions, Rachel Ward’s legacy in the film industry is undeniable. Her iconic role as Maggie remains a testament to her enduring talent and charm.
Leave a Reply