Prince Philip’s brutal nickname for Meghan Markle revealed

According to a royal expert, the late Prince Philip had a rather pointed nickname for the Duchess of Sussex, and it wasn’t so kind.

The nickname suggested a comparison to Wallis Simpson, the controversial wife of the former King Edward VIII, drawing parallels between Meghan Markle and Wallis, both American and divorced when they married into the royal family.

Prince Philip supposedly referred to Meghan with a name that made reference to this connection.

Wallis Simpson and King Edward VIII

Wallis Simpson, an American divorcée who became the Duchess of Windsor, was one of the most controversial royal figures in recent history after King Edward VIII decided to abdicate the throne in December 1936 (after less than a year as a monarch) to be able to marry her.

Credit: Getty.

At the time, royals were prohibited from entering into a marriage with a divorced person – a rule that did not change until 2002, just three years before the then-Prince Charles married Camilla, per the Royal Observer.

Following King Edward and Wallis Simpson’s marriage, they were not allowed to return home without the permission of his brother, the new King George VI, as there were fears it could potentially cause public unrest, Vogue detailed.

During their years of exile, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor constantly attracted headlines – with one of their most shocking incidents occurring in 1937 when they visited Nazi Germany and were photographed giving the notorious Nazi salute upon meeting Adolf Hitler.

In October 1937, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor visited Germany, against the advice of the British government, and met Adolf Hitler at his Obersalzberg retreat. Credit: Universal History Archive / Universal Images Group / Getty.

Prince Philip’s brutal nickname

Royal biographer Ingrid Seward shed light on Prince Philip’s perspective during an interview with GB News, suggesting that he thought Meghan and Wallis Simpson had many similarities, leading to the adoption of a discreet nickname for the Duchess of Sussex.

Allegedly Prince Philip, who Seward says was known for his astute judgment of character, couldn’t overlook the resemblances between Meghan and Prince Harry and Edward and Mrs. Simpson.

Credit: Matt Dunham – WPA Pool / Getty.

“I think that Prince Philip was very canny about people and he didn’t always see bad in people, he often tried to see the good in them,” Seward said.

“He just could not get away from the similarities between Meghan and Harry and Edward and Ms Simpson, which his why he used to call her the Duchess of Windsor. Not to her face though, he used to call her DOW,” she added.

In her book ‘My Mother and I‘, Seward delved further into Prince Philip’s reservations about Meghan, describing him as “wary” of the former Suits actress and her potential impact on the royal family.

While Prince Philip saw Meghan as potentially disruptive, Queen Elizabeth II held “high hopes” for her, indicating differing perspectives within the royal family regarding Meghan’s role and influence.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle left royal life

Since stepping back from their royal duties in 2020 and relocating to California, Meghan and Harry have maintained a relatively low profile within the royal sphere.

While Harry is set to visit the UK for the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games, with a service to be held at St. Paul’s Cathedral on May 8, according to the Daily Express. Meghan is expected to remain in the US, citing safety concerns and a desire to avoid stirring up controversy.

Despite occasional returns to the UK for significant events like Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral in 2022, Meghan has opted out of attending others, such as King Charles III’s coronation, which Harry attended alone last year.

It’s clear that Meghan is choosing to prioritizing her safety and peace amidst constant scrutiny and public interest in her relationship with the royal family.

What did you think of this story? Be sure to let us know in the comments!

‘We Left. As Did LOTS of the Crowd’: Fans Shame Miranda Lambert for Her Behavior at Montana Festival – What Happened?

Country music star Miranda Lambert is no stranger to the spotlight, but her recent performance at the Montana Festival has sparked considerable controversy and disappointment among fans. As videos circulated on social media, many expressed their disillusionment, with some claiming they’ve lost interest in the artist altogether. This incident is not the first time Lambert has faced backlash for her behavior on stage, and it raises questions about the balance between performer and audience.

On July 14, during her set at the Montana Festival, Lambert addressed the crowd in a way that many found off-putting. In a clip shared widely online, she can be seen reprimanding the audience for their apparent lack of attention. “I can see your head is not turned the right way, which is this way,” she declared, pointing to herself as if to remind them where the focus should be. 

The crowd’s reaction was mixed; while some fans cheered in support of their favorite artist, others felt uncomfortable and even embarrassed. Many attendees, who had come to enjoy the music, began to leave the venue, disheartened by Lambert’s apparent frustration. The atmosphere shifted dramatically from one of excitement to tension, leaving many wondering if this was the Miranda they had once adored.

Social media erupted in response to the incident. Posts flooded platforms, with many fans expressing their disappointment in Lambert’s behavior. Comments ranged from supportive to critical, with some users stating they felt “disrespected” by her attitude. “I used to love her music, but now I’m questioning if I want to support an artist who treats her fans like this,” one commenter wrote.

This backlash has sparked a broader conversation about celebrity behavior and audience expectations. Fans have increasingly voiced their desire for artists to create an inclusive and positive experience, rather than alienating those who have come to enjoy their performances.

This incident is not an isolated occurrence for Lambert. In the past, she has faced scrutiny for her on-stage demeanor, including instances where her comments and actions have rubbed fans the wrong way. Critics argue that such behavior reflects a growing trend among some artists who may take their success for granted and forget the importance of their audience.

For many fans, music is a sanctuary, a place where they can escape their daily lives and connect with others. When an artist behaves in a way that seems dismissive or condescending, it can shatter that illusion and leave listeners feeling alienated. Lambert’s recent actions have raised concerns that she may not fully appreciate the relationship between artist and fan, which is built on mutual respect and admiration.

As the backlash continues to grow, the question remains: what does this mean for Miranda Lambert’s career moving forward? Many fans are vocal about their discontent, but Lambert has a long-standing career filled with chart-topping hits and a loyal following. However, with the rise of social media, artists are more exposed than ever, and a single misstep can lead to a significant shift in public perception.

It will be interesting to see how Lambert addresses this situation, if at all. Will she acknowledge the backlash and make an effort to mend her relationship with fans, or will she brush it off as just another fleeting controversy? In the fast-paced world of country music, the response to such incidents can often dictate an artist’s trajectory.

This incident serves as a reminder of the complexities of celebrity culture. Fans invest emotionally in artists, and when those artists act in a way that feels dismissive, it can lead to a deep sense of betrayal. As the lines between performer and audience continue to blur, it is crucial for artists to recognize their role in shaping the experience of their fans.

Miranda Lambert’s recent actions at the Montana Festival have left many questioning not only her behavior but also the values that underpin the relationship between artists and their supporters. As the dust settles, it remains to be seen whether Lambert will take this opportunity for reflection and growth or whether the controversy will simply fade away, leaving her with a tarnished reputation in the eyes of some fans.

The fallout from the Montana Festival is just one chapter in the ongoing story of Miranda Lambert’s career. While she has captivated audiences with her powerful voice and heartfelt lyrics, her recent behavior raises important questions about accountability and connection in the music industry. As fans await her next move, one thing is clear: the relationship between artists and their audience is a delicate balance, one that requires mutual respect and

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*